The Function Analysis System Technique Construction Essay

The Function Analysis System Technique Construction screenI have been employed by the University of Salford as a project management consultant. The University is considering constructing a youthful twist call Clifford Whitworth library building 2(CWLB2) This new building will be identical to the existing Clifford Whitworth subroutine library Building (CWLB1) and will be attached to the north end of the conference centre building next to CWLB1 on an existing grassed argona. The new Clifford withworth library building will be a mirror image of CWLB1 with regard to its horizontal plan and height dimensions.In this situation, the University is keen to maximise measure out or eliminating any unnecessary woos on any new building projects when the current economic modality is given. It also wants an environmentally sustainable building which potful obtain a full(prenominal) BREEAM ratingThe picture in above show the current Clifford Whitworth Library existing building and the new proposed library building. meet brief for Task AIn this Task, I have to produce a report such as value engineering analysis of the existing CWLB 1 building and identified of functional components of the building with approximate address breakdown and 80/20 histogram, other than that, I have to analyse the 4 study components such as roof, floor and wall etc. And detail analysis in feature scoring matrix of 1 major component, with explanation and justification of criteria and alternatives.The cost plan show at the below is the cost for Clifford whitworth Library building 1 is 5,417,936.52. In this project, I have use BCIS analysis 21757, 22865 and 21620 to analyze the cost of member or determine per meter squ atomic number 18 for this specification material. In situation of this I have used immaterial quotations for a number of the elements, and Spons Architectural Price Book 2010 for the balance.The Clifford Whitworth Library building 1 project taken in BCIS which located a t Greater Manchester. The cost analysis will therefore need general adjustments for in compressedion and location factors. Inflation bottom be dealt with by using a tender price . According to the BCIS for Elemental analysis number 21757 in 2002, the cost per m2 for roof is 42.43 and the cost is 12,134, The Tender price value show the proposed project from the BCIS is 182(1Q2002) and the current is 209(4Q2010) .The variation factors atomic number 18 currently 91 for Greater Manchester and 107 for the Berkshire. All these data can be obtained from BCIS. Using the above in stoolation, the cost analysis can be adjusted as followsUpdated cost analysis = cost analyisis X current tender price index/regional price tender X Greater Manchester regional index/ Berkshire regional index= 42.43 X 209/182 X 91/107Revised Cost analysis = 41.44 x 5381.52 m2 = 223,010.19 judicial admission for cost plan Clifford Whitworth Library Building 1ElementSpecification1SubstructurePCC driven piles. Concre te pile caps, ground beams and 150mm slab.2AFramePCC columns accompaniment upper floor steel/timber supporting rafters.2BUpper floorsRC upper floors on permanent formwork.2C crown270m2 mono-pitched alloy clad library roof 69m2 metal clad plywood decking on timber rafters. Langley roofing to becharm (25m2). Aluminium rainwater pipes.2DStairsDitto, basement to second floor2EExternal wallsRendered shove/ overeat walls larch Rainscreen cladding double glazed aluminium drape walling.2FWindows and external doorsDouble glazed powder coated aluminium atomic number 82ows. Oak panelled entrance doors aluminium louvred doors to plant room.2GInternal walls and partitionsBlock and metal stud partitions. PCC walls to lift and stairs 2No glazed timber lightwells to 1st floor.2HInternal doorsAsh veneered flush doors.3A wall finishesPlaster and emulsion high level acoustic panels.3BFloor finishesVinyl sheet, tufted loop pile carpet and non-slip ceramic tile floorings.3CCeiling finishes lining to underside of roof panels. Plasterboard, timber and other suspended ceilings.4FittingsFittings5ASanitary appliancesWhite vitreous china sanitaryw atomic number 18 Doc M pack.5CDisposal installationsSoil and bollix pipes.5DWater installationsHot and cold water services.5FSpace heating and air treatmentGas fired low temperature hot water central heating. nimbus handling unit and VRV air conditioning.5GVentilating systemsExtract ventilation to toilets and kitchen. Natural ventilation.5HElectrical installationsElectric light and power. Emergency lighting.5JLift and conveyor installations10-person, 800kg 3 stops 0.75m/s5KProtective installationsLightning nurtureion.5LCommunications installationsFire detection and alarm. CCTV, data and telephone cables PA.5MSpecial installationsRainwater harvesting BMS.5NBuilders work in conjunctionBuilders work in connection with services.6ASite worksExcavation to reduce levels. Concrete block paviours.6BDrainageFoul and surface water drainage.6CEx ternal servicesGas, water, electricity mains. External lighting.7Preliminaries8% of remainder of Contract Sum (excluding Contingencies).8Contingencies4.41% of remainder of Contract Sum (excluding Preliminaries).HistogramThe Histogram for old Clifford Whitworth library building 1 show that the percentage from the element of the total cost of the building, the histogram show that the electrical installation cost the most in Clifford Withworth Library Building, they cost 9.54% of the total cost of the building, they cost 516,787.37. External walls atomic number 18 ranked second in the chart, they cost 9.33% of the total cost of the building, they cost 505,432.36. Frame is the third highest in the chart, they cost 9.29% of the total cost of the building.The Fitting and furnishings are the lowest percentage of the Clifford Withworth library building 1, they cost simply 0.11% of the 100% of the building, they cost only 6,027.30, the Disposal Installation are the second lowest in the cha rt, they cost only 0.20% of the building, last but not least, Gas installation are the third lowest in the chart, they cost approximately 0.21 %The 4 major components i choose is roof, external wall, framce and upper floor.Function Analysis System Technique (F.A.S.T. Diagram) in RoofAluminiumTimberMaterialPrecast coverRainProtect the buildingHeat, sunlightAcquire medium BREEAM ratingSustainablyRoofHeatinsulationColdNoiseDurabilityCost brio Cycle CostAccording to the FAST diagram, roof most car park material is Aluminium and precast cover, mark and timber. Most of the Roof are normally protects against the rain, other than that, the roof also can protect the sunlight or heat and wind, the rating BREEAM for Sustainably will be medium. The insulation of the Roof is they can hold open the heat, cold and the noise.F.A.S.T. Diagram in External wallRoofSupportCeilingAreaProtect the buildingExternal WallAcquire high BREEAM BuildingSustainablyNoiseInsulationDurabilityCostAccording to th e FAST diagram, External wall use to support the Roof and ceiling, they also can protect the building area when external wall have installed. The rating BREEAM Building for the suitainably is high. They also have a advantages on the insulation, they can prevent the noise and windF.A.S.T. Diagram in FrameTimberReinforced concretematerialSteelconstructionFrameFastGood in fire metrosustainabledesigneasiernavigationmaintainAccording to the FAST diagram, Frame most common material is Timber, Reinforced concrete and steel, frame are truly fast in construction process, they are very good in sustainable and last but not least, frame also can attract the easier to navigate and the frame also can make it easier to design and maintain your site.F.A.S.T Diagram in upper floor.TimberReinforced ConcreteMaterialSteelSoundInsulationUpper floorFastConstructionGood in fire resistanceSustainableAccording to the FAST diagram, Upper floor most common material is timber, reinforced concrete and steel, Upper floor are very good insulation in Sound, the Upper floor are very fast in construction process, they are very good in fire resistance and sustainable.Combined Scoring matrix in the external wallCritiria Combined matrixAInitial CostA2BMaintenance CostA4B3A3CAestheticsB2A2D3B2A3DInsulation propertiesE2B3D2F2Emagazine for constructionD2E2FDurabilityGGFEDCBAExterior wall AlternativesRaw account statement( )( 2 )( 2+2 )( 2+2+3 )(0)(3+2+2+3)(2+4+3++2+3)24701014Analysis matrixWeight of importance (1-10)13517101Glazed curtain wall23341147291547103Metal panel23331256291537204Solid concrete block wall32424389362022830According to the combined scoring matrix, we are concerned more on the cost and time instead of design in Clifford Whitworth library building 1, the combined scoring matrix show that which type of the external wall is the best choice for the new proposal building in term of the criteria matrix, In the end, the brick and block wall are the best choice for alternative to pr oposed the new Clifford whitworth library building with a score of 89 points.Project brief for task 2In this report, we have to do the new proposal for the 4 components which selected in task 1 to improve the quality and cost of the building to propose the new Clifford Whitworth Library Building with explanation, structure and presentation. The 4 major components to propose the new building is roof, external wall, frame and upper floor.RoofReinforced concrete are the best choice for the new Clifford Whitworth Library building, they are construct in the similar way as reinforced concrete floors beam and insitu cast concrete slab. Roofs are normally to support the self weight of the roof together with loading from heat, snow and rain, the roof also can prevent the wind pressure as well. The concrete roofs are normally constructed in flat roof, and library has no enquiry to construct in flat roof.R.Greeno (2007) stated that The Strength for the reinforced concrete itself has compressi ve strength. The crushing strength of normal concrete will depend on its composition. The concrete are normally fatigued in tension, its strength in this respect being only one fourteenth to one eighth of its compressive strength.WallAccording to the Combined scoring matrix, substantiality concrete block wall are the best choice to proposed the new building. A solid concrete block wall is the filled solid with concrete and lightweight concrete blocks. As different to produce a concrete wall where the wall must be created from wood and poured with concrete, then the forms have to be removed, then the concrete block wall can be constructed more fast and easier because of the material construction.The solid concrete block wall have many advantages such as the wall is very solid in sustainable, other than that, they can over a formed and poured concrete wall. When the concrete walls formed, the wooden form built from plywood have been constructed, they are always subject to misalignme nt, even after they have been squared and leveled, because of the flexible nature of the wood.The solid concrete block walls are good in sound insulation. which means the solid concrete block walls are suitable to construct in the library . the solid concrete block wall are good in fire resistant, which means the building not easily to get burnt.FrameFrame most common material is Timber, Reinforced concrete and steel, but steel inclose are the most suitable frame structured for the new building, the designed for steel framed is the connection between the separated member treated as either non-rigid or fully rigid joints.Steel are made under milling machinery conditions are subject to british standards. The strength of a steel frame is controlled and established during manufacture. On fire resistance, steel frame have no doubt with the fire resistance, but the still will get weaker in strength when the temperature hit 299 Celsius above. In construction process, still frame can redu ced up to 50% compare to the traditional methods, in this result, steel frame can reduces cost during construction process.Steel frames can live straight, but the timber only can move and warp, twist and shrink during and after construction. This considerably reduces in progress maintenance, as there are less call backs for things like plasterboard cracking or framing popping.Steel framing can span long distances, allowing greater design flexibility. Interior walls can be placed without supporting(prenominal) considerations compared to timber framing and other framing.Upper floorLast but not least, Concrete Upper floor is my best options to propose the library because they are good in sound insulation between floor to floor, Concrete Upper floor also good in fire resistant, they can ranging for half(a) and hour to 1 hour depend on the floor type.The concrete upper floor have a good quality, the concrete floor can be act as a thermal store which can reduce in the heating price espe cially the floor heating systems are used. The precast concrete floor can span longer than timber floor, the precast concrete can small span up to 4.6 m in one- way span.Referencinghttp//www.ehow.com/about_6522371_advantages-solid-concrete-block-wall.html